Reviewer's Responsibilities

E-ISSN: 2640-2874 · Upholding the standards of scholarly excellence and ethical peer review

Introduction

Reviewers are entrusted with a vital responsibility in the scholarly publishing process. Their evaluations ensure that manuscripts meet the standards of scientific integrity, novelty, and relevance. By fulfilling their duties diligently, reviewers safeguard the credibility of APCR and contribute to the advancement of pathology and clinical research.

Confidentiality

All submitted manuscripts are confidential. Reviewers must not share content with others, use unpublished information for personal gain, or disclose findings without permission. Review material must be securely deleted after review completion.

Objectivity and Fairness

  • Reviews should focus solely on the content, avoiding prejudice or bias.
  • Comments must be evidence-based and constructive.
  • Language should be respectful and professional at all times.

Quality of Feedback

Reviewers should provide comprehensive feedback that helps authors improve their work. This includes:

  • Identifying methodological strengths and weaknesses.
  • Suggesting clarifications to enhance readability.
  • Highlighting significant contributions of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must declare conflicts of interest, whether financial, personal, or professional. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the invitation or inform the editor immediately.

Timeliness

Reviewers are expected to complete assignments within the designated timeframe, usually 2–3 weeks. Delays should be communicated promptly to the editorial office.

Integrity in Review

  • Do not plagiarize or appropriate ideas from manuscripts.
  • Do not use AI tools irresponsibly for content evaluation without human oversight.
  • Report suspected ethical issues or misconduct discreetly to the editor.

Recommendations

Reviewers should conclude their reports with a recommendation, clearly explaining the rationale:

  • Accept
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Reject

Professional Development

Serving as a reviewer enhances professional expertise and contributes to academic reputation. APCR acknowledges reviewers’ service through annual recognition and potential consideration for editorial roles.

Contact

For guidance on reviewer responsibilities or to raise concerns, please contact the editorial office:

[email protected]